Texte paru dans: / Appeared in:
 
Fanfare Magazine: 43:1 (09-10/2019) 
Pour s'abonner / Subscription information
Les abonnés à Fanfare Magazine ont accès aux archives du magazine sur internet.
Subscribers to Fanfare Magazine have access to the archives of the magazine on the net.


BIS
BIS2197



Code barres / Barcode : 7318599921976

 
Reviewer: Jerry Dubins
 

My first mistake was in assuming that the Kuusisto playing the Bach Sonatas and Partitas for Unaccompanied Violin on the present BIS set was the same Kuusisto whose 1996 Ondine recording of the Sibelius Violin Concerto I have in my collection and have long admired. Not so. My Sibelius Kuusisto is Pekka. The Kuusisto of these Bach performances is Jaako. Are they related, or is Kuusisto as common a surname in Finland as Smith is in America? I don’t know. Jaako was born in 1974, Pekka in 1976, so I suppose they could be brothers or paternal cousins. Pekka is primarily a violinist. Jaako, as the present album attests, is also a violinist, but is probably better known as a conductor and composer.

 

My second mistake was listening to Jaako’s Bach twice. The first time through, I will admit, I was gobsmacked by Jaako’s phenomenal technique. The ease with which he sailed through the rough seas of double-stops and chords, the smoothness and beauty of his tone—on a 1702 Mateo Gofriller violin with modern setup, I might add—the accuracy of his intonation, and the propulsive energy of his playing all initially had me convinced that here was a set of Bach’s Sonatas and Partitas to vie against the best of the best by the greatest players past or present.


Then I listened to Kuusisto’s Bach a second time, and I began to realize that I had allowed myself to be seduced by the violinist’s technical brilliance and wizardry rather than by any particular interpretive vision, emotional conviction, or spiritual connection he had to the music. I found myself echoing Harry Townsend’s review of Shlomo Mintz’s Bach in 9:1, in which he felt the violinist was “more focused on playing the violin than on playing Bach.”

I couldn’t help but wonder, when did the fast-paced movements of these Sonatas and Partitas become contests in velocity to see not just who could play them the fastest, but what the finite limits of “fast” were? It wasn’t that long ago—in 39:2, to be precise—that I reviewed Gil Shaham’s Bach, and was flabbergasted and flummoxed in equal measure by how such an esteemed violinist could have transformed the music into such a cartoonish caricature of itself with tempos so fast that it was as if he had set his metronome to its maximum speed and then dared himself to beat it. His Chaconne from the D-Minor Partita, at 11:04, was the fastest I had ever encountered.


Kuusisto’s Chaconne is a more reasonable 13:22, about on a par with Arthur Grumiaux and Christian Tetzlaff, but it’s Kuusisto’s fast movements that are off the charts. Articulation, which is largely a function of finger to bow coordination, is maintained, in itself a minor miracle, but what suffers is inflection, which is largely a function of the player’s ability to shade or modulate his tone and to shape the line into distinct, communicative phrases.


Let me give a couple of examples of what I’m talking about. Bach’s phrase construction often exhibits a reciprocity in which a given pattern of notes appears, and is then echoed or mirrored, but not until a bar or two later, so that the ear has to make the connection. A case in point is the first Double movement in the Partita No. 1 in B Minor. On the last beat of bar 19, you have a wide string-crossing figure, from F#  up an octave and a third to A, then dipping down an octave and a fourth to E, and then up again an octave and a third from the E to G. It’s a very striking gesture, but one that somehow wants a complementary gesture to balance and complete it. The corresponding gesture comes, but not until the end of bar 20, where the string crossings go from D up an octave and a third to F#, down an octave and fourth to C#, and then up an octave and a third, from the C# to E. The player needs to inflect these seesawing pivots in a way that the listener is made aware of how they interlock.


Now, this is one of the movements in which Kuusisto is definitely not fast. But for all of his diminuendos, crescendos, slight tenutos and accelerandos—all attempts at expressive phrasing—it’s as if he doesn’t really get how the pieces of the puzzle fit together, and the result is a picture that doesn’t make sense. He makes all of the right gestures, but they’re in the wrong places and their timing is off. So, what we hear—or what I hear—are running sequences of notes, beautifully played, but unorganized into a coherent, meaningful shape.

The concluding movement of the Sonata No. 1 in G Minor is an example of how and where Kuusisto misses the mark in a fast movement. I don’t know if Bach himself marked the tempo Presto, but it’s what is given in the Urtext, and it’s what has stuck. This is one of those movements in which Kuusisto breaks the speed barrier, and in so doing, loses the ability to juxtapose the shifting groupings of running 16th notes that Bach cleverly rearranges to make us question the meter.

 

The movement is in 3/8 time, but the ways in which the six 16th notes in each bar are grouped—sometimes in two groups of threes slurred together; other times in three groups of twos slurred together; and still other times each note bowed separately—leaves us wondering whether the measure is in one beat (six 16ths in a single beat), two beats (two pairs of triplets per bar), or three beats (three pairs of 16th notes slurred in twos). It gets even crazier when six 16ths are slurred, but beginning on the second 16th of a bar, so that the last 16th is slurred across the bar line to become the downbeat of the next bar. I’m sure Bach had a lot of fun with this, but at Kuusisto’s speed-of-light tempo, much of the rhythmic game of “gotcha” goes by the boards.


Now, let me back up, for I would not want my critique of Jaako Kuusisto’s readings to leave the reader with a wholly negative impression.
The issues described above relate specifically and exclusively to matters of interpretation. As pure violin playing goes, Kuusisto’s performances are nothing short of amazing. His technical execution is among the best I’ve ever heard, and for that alone, anyone interested in these works needs to experience Kuusisto’s Bach for a trip to the realm of the impossible made possible.



 



Fermer la fenêtre/Close window

Sélectionnez votre pays et votre devise en accédant au site de
Presto Classical
(Bouton en haut à droite)

Pour acheter l'album
ou le télécharger


To purchase the CD
or to download it

Choose your country and curency
when reaching
Presto Classical
(Upper right corner of the page)

 

Cliquez l'un ou l'autre bouton pour découvrir bien d'autres critiques de CD
 Click either button for many other reviews